This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug tapsets/11263] exposing foo32 syscalls


------- Additional Comments From mjw at redhat dot com  2010-02-09 15:43 -------
The "problem" to me is that we don't do this splitting of 32on64 versus "pure
64" bit syscalls consistently. Why do we have syscall.pipe32 and syscall.mmap32,
but not syscall.fstat32 for example?

syscall.fstat is a nice example since we make it match any syscall variant that
is called "fstat" whether it is the "plain" one or the compat/32on64 version.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11263

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]