This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
[Bug uprobes/10458] uaddr() returns one past current instruction for uprobes
- From: "jistone at redhat dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 30 Jul 2009 00:28:19 -0000
- Subject: [Bug uprobes/10458] uaddr() returns one past current instruction for uprobes
- References: <20090729111010.10458.mjw@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From jistone at redhat dot com 2009-07-30 00:28 -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> > Barring that, it may be useful to add a probe_type enum to CONTEXT that
> > categorizes the probe flavors.
>
> Perhaps, but the runtime
Indeed, think of the runtime!
> How about instead using the emit_probe_local_init() to generate
> adjustment code?
Actually, I'm a little nervous that emit_probe_local_init() may not be playing
nicely with the probe-body-duplication checks. I'm contemplating getting rid of
that piece, as it only has one minor use right now.
If this is always an issue for uprobes, why not just adjust it directly in
enter_uprobe_probe?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10458
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.