This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
Re: [RFC][ PATCH -tip v2 0/7] kprobes: Kprobes jump optimization support
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at redhat dot com>
- To: Ingo Molnar <mingo at elte dot hu>
- Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth at in dot ibm dot com>, lkml <linux-kernel at vger dot kernel dot org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa at zytor dot com>, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec at gmail dot com>, Jim Keniston <jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com>, Srikar Dronamraju <srikar at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch at infradead dot org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis dot org>, Anders Kaseorg <andersk at ksplice dot com>, Tim Abbott <tabbott at ksplice dot com>, systemtap <systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com>, DLE <dle-develop at lists dot sourceforge dot net>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:08:24 -0400
- Subject: Re: [RFC][ PATCH -tip v2 0/7] kprobes: Kprobes jump optimization support
- References: <20090622212255.5384.53732.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20090623114252.GB9497@elte.hu> <4A40E153.9030704@redhat.com> <20090623194009.GA8777@elte.hu> <4A414F0D.3020805@redhat.com>
Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Plus i'd suggest a runtime control (a sysctl) as well - if it's not
>> too intrusive. Since this is an optional speedup feature, distros
>> can have this enabled and if there's some problem with it then it
>> can still be disabled in sysctl.conf, without having to rebuild the
>> kernel.
>
> The runtime control is a good idea. Btw, current kprobes already has
> a runtime disable interface under sysfs. Is there any reason that we'd
> better to use sysctl instead of sysfs?
Oops, s/sysfs/debugfs/g.
--
Masami Hiramatsu
Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division
e-mail: mhiramat@redhat.com