This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFC][ PATCH -tip v2 0/7] kprobes: Kprobes jump optimization support


Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com> writes:

> Hi Andi,
>
> Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@redhat.com> writes:
>>> The gcc's crossjumping unifies equivalent code by inserting indirect
>>> jumps which jump into other function body. It is hard to know to where
>>> these jumps jump, so I decided to disable it when setting
>>> CONFIG_OPTPROBES=y.
>> 
>> That sounds quite bad. Tail call optimization is an important optimization
>> that especially on kernel style code (lots of indirect pointers
>> and sometimes deep call chains) is very useful.  It would be quite
>> sad if production kernels would lose that optimization.
>
> I think the crossjumping is not the tail call optimization,
> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.4.6/gccint/Passes.html

Statement didn't make sense then. The RTL crossjump pass you're referring
AFAIK does not jump into other functions, it only optimizes jumps 
inside a function (unless you're talking about inlines)
 
>> Also tail calls in C should always jump directly to another function,
>> so they shouldn't be particularly complex to manage.
>
> Tail call jumps directly into the head of another function,
> not the middle. Thus it is safe.

cross jumping does neither.

>
>>> I also decided not to optimize probes when it is in functions which
>>> will cause exceptions, because the exception in the kernel will jump
>>> to a fixup code and the fixup code jumps back to the middle of the
>>> same function body.
>> 
>> Note that not only exceptions do that, there are a few other cases
>> where jumps in and out of out of line sections happen. You might
>> need a more general mechanism to detect this.
>
> As far as I can see (under arch/x86), Almost all fixup entries are
> defined with ex_table entries, and others jump to the head of
> symbols(or functions). The jumps which jump into the middle of
> some functions are what I need to find, and, as far as I know,
> those fixup jumps are used with exception tables. Of course,
> I might miss some fixup codes, in that case, please let me know:-)

One case for example are out of line sections generated by gcc itself
with the right options.

-andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]