This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
[Bug translator/10102] optional probe points should silently accept "probe point mismatch" errors
- From: "wenji dot huang at oracle dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 5 May 2009 07:32:58 -0000
- Subject: [Bug translator/10102] optional probe points should silently accept "probe point mismatch" errors
- References: <20090424173130.10102.fche@redhat.com>
- Reply-to: sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org
------- Additional Comments From wenji dot huang at oracle dot com 2009-05-05 07:32 -------
Created an attachment (id=3923)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3923&action=view)
Updated patch
This patch will tolerate the failure for optional probe in derive_probe as
Frank mentioned in comment #6. Seems all the probe types can be covered.
$ stap -p2 -ue 'probe foo?, process("/do/not/exist").function("main") !,
kernel.mark("no such mark") ?, kernel.trace("no trace") !, process.foo ?,
kernel.statement("no statement") !, module("no mod").function("*") ?, begin {}'
# probes
begin /* <- foo?,process("/do/not/exist").function("main")!,kernel.mark("no
such mark")?,kernel.trace("no trace")!,process.foo?,kernel.statement("no
statement")!,module("no mod").function("*")?,begin */
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #3909 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
Attachment #3922 is|0 |1
obsolete| |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10102
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.