This is the mail archive of the
systemtap@sourceware.org
mailing list for the systemtap project.
Re: Backward compatibility for insn probe point
- From: David Smith <dsmith at redhat dot com>
- To: Maynard Johnson <maynardj at us dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: systemtap at sourceware dot org, "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 16:00:57 -0500
- Subject: Re: Backward compatibility for insn probe point
- References: <49D3E3DF.1000108@us.ibm.com>
Maynard Johnson wrote:
> Frank has already made the changes in runtime/itrace.c to support
> backward compatibility with older utrace.
> I wanted to test the insn probe point on an older utrace, so I built
> and installed systemtap 0.9.5 on a ppc970 blade running RHEL 5.3. I
> ran the following simple test:
>
> # stap -c /bin/ls simple-test.stp /bin/ls -o simple-out -k -vvv
> where simple-test.stp is . . .
> =========simple-test.stp ========================
> global instrs = 0
>
> probe begin {
> printf("systemtap starting probe\n")
> }
>
> probe process(@1).insn {
> instrs += 1
> }
>
> probe end { printf("systemtap ending probe\n")
> printf("itraced = %d\n", instrs)
> }
> ==================================
>
> The result of the above test is that the stap command hangs at
> "stapio:start_cmd:195 execing target_cmd /bin/ls". If I Ctl-C the
> job, it finished (i.e, I see "Pass 5: run completed ..."), but the
> output file contents indicate the insn probe was not hit (i.e.,
> "itraced = 0").
>
> Any suggestions on where to look for the problem?
I took a look at this and fixed it. For more details, see
<http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10091>.
--
David Smith
dsmith@redhat.com
Red Hat
http://www.redhat.com
256.217.0141 (direct)
256.837.0057 (fax)