This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Use of -Werror in systemtap Module Makefiles

From: Martin Hunt <hunt at redhat dot com>
To: David Wilder <dwilder at us dot ibm dot com>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>, systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:35:12 -0400
Subject: Re: Use of -Werror in systemtap Module Makefiles
Organization: Red Hat Inc.
References: <4521510C.9070700@us.ibm.com> <y0mu02msif6.fsf@ton.toronto.redhat.com> <45216534.5080302@us.ibm.com> <20061002185244.GC30211@redhat.com> <4521873D.8010608@us.ibm.com>

On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 14:40 -0700, David Wilder wrote:

> 
> I will see if we can cleanup  _stp_vsnprintf before changing the kernel 
> config.

Could you post some analysis of the stack usage?  I don't know much
about S390s, but even with a lot of function inlining I don't see how
the stack frame could get near 256 bytes for that function.

Martin

References:
- Use of -Werror in systemtap Module Makefiles
  - From: David Wilder
- Re: Use of -Werror in systemtap Module Makefiles
  - From: Frank Ch. Eigler
- Re: Use of -Werror in systemtap Module Makefiles
  - From: David Wilder
- Re: Use of -Werror in systemtap Module Makefiles
  - From: Frank Ch. Eigler
- Re: Use of -Werror in systemtap Module Makefiles
  - From: David Wilder

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]