This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: User-space probes: Plan B+

From: Jim Keniston <jkenisto at us dot ibm dot com>
To: James Dickens <jamesd dot wi at gmail dot com>
Cc: SystemTAP <systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: 25 Aug 2006 16:52:17 -0700
Subject: Re: User-space probes: Plan B+
Organization:
References: <1156468404.2848.5.camel@dyn9047018079.beaverton.ibm.com> <cd09bdd10608250111p4601aea2r20bca9d2fbc3df22@mail.gmail.com> <1156530170.2740.96.camel@dyn9047018079.beaverton.ibm.com> <cd09bdd10608251314h6aedc136r210c2ae3ee954ccb@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 13:14, James Dickens wrote:
[Several valid observations about performance and security]

If Frank and James were the only people we have to please, I guess we
could settle for the kernel-side user-probepoint API, which has been
around in one form or another for months.  Maybe that should be patch #1
for Plan B+.

Jim

Follow-Ups:
- Re: User-space probes: Plan B+
  - From: Vara Prasad

References:
- User-space probes: Plan B+
  - From: Jim Keniston
- Re: User-space probes: Plan B+
  - From: James Dickens
- Re: User-space probes: Plan B+
  - From: Jim Keniston
- Re: User-space probes: Plan B+
  - From: James Dickens

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]