This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Fw: [ltc-interlock] [RFC] draft NFS trace hooks (fwd)


Tony Reix <tony.reix@bull.net> writes:

> [...] I'm not sure I perfectly understood the explanations, but it
> seems to me that "dynamic" probes do require gcc to provide
> debugging information that prevent it to run full optimizations.

No, we don't interfere with gcc optimization, and in exchange may
receive less-than-perfect debugging information.  Systemtap can
usually make do with that, or tell the user otherwise during
script translation.

> On the contrary, "Static probing markers" are "faster and more
> precise than kprobes", at the cost of the "waste of a few cycles".
> I have to read the end of the paper, but mixing dynamic and static
> probes could be useful.

Indeed, that's the hope.  We just need some brave souls to start
plopping markers in.

- FChE


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]