This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the systemtap project.
Re: Meeting minutes 20060727
- From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami dot hiramatsu dot pt at hitachi dot com>
- To: jrs at us dot ibm dot com
- Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni at redhat dot com>, systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu dot desnoyers at polymtl dot ca>
- Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 01:58:46 +0900
- Subject: Re: Meeting minutes 20060727
- Organization: Systems Development Lab., Hitachi, Ltd., Japan
- References: <email@example.com> <44CF0AA0.firstname.lastname@example.org>
Jose R. Santos wrote:
> Elena Zannoni wrote:
>> OLS action items: - static probes discussion
>> - standardization of tracing mechanism to happen on systemtap mailing
> Hi Folks,
> After reviewing the code for both LTTng and LKST it seems like LKET
> shares more similarities with LKST than it does with LTTng (both in
> available trace hooks and general philosophy of the projects). Another
> key advantage of the LKST projects is that the folks from Hitachi have a
> set of post-processing programs already available. LTTv on the other
> hand does not seem to have that many useful post-processing plugin.
> I would say that a good starting point would be to get LKET and LKST
> standardize as much as possible since I think they share the most in
That's good to me.
I had ported most of probing points of LKST to some tapsets against
RHEL4U3. I'll release that code as soon as possible. It'll help you.
LKST already has post-processing tools(Lkst Log Tools). "lkstla" is the
core of these tools. Currently, this tool depends on LKST. But, I think
its framework can be adaptable for many kind of traced data.
2nd Research Dept.
Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory