This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sourceware.org mailing list for the systemtap project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Martin, Can you mail your fix so I can verify the same on my Ia64 box. -thanks, Anil >-----Original Message----- >From: systemtap-owner@sourceware.org >[mailto:systemtap-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Martin Hunt >Sent: Friday, November 11, 2005 12:36 PM >To: William Cohen >Cc: systemtap@sources.redhat.com >Subject: Re: Recent test results > >On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 14:35 -0500, William Cohen wrote: >> Tried out testing a current snapshot of systemtap (20051111) on some >> systems. >[...] >> Looking into why some of the x86_64 tests start failing when all are >> run. It looks like it is failing in the same way as the ia64 tests >> that Anil ran earlier in the week; things go wrong with simple.exp. >> Also noticed that x86_64 version failed to report the systemtap >> version. >I got the same results as you. > >I'm certainly not an expect expert, but a quick look at stap_run.exp >shows a major flaw. I made a quick fix and now I get: > >Running ./systemtap.samples/syscalls2.exp ... >Running ./systemtap.samples/sysopen.exp ... >Running ./systemtap.samples/transport.exp ... > > === systemtap Summary === > ># of expected passes 107 > >kernel version: 2.6.9-22.0.1.ELsmp >systemtap translator version: version 0.4.2 built 2005-11-11 > > > >
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |