This is the mail archive of the systemtap@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the systemtap project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Allow a jprobe to coexist with kprobes

From: Vara Prasad <prasadav at us dot ibm dot com>
To: "Keshavamurthy, Anil S" <anil dot s dot keshavamurthy at intel dot com>
Cc: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <amavin at redhat dot com>, SystemTAP <systemtap at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 16:16:49 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Allow a jprobe to coexist with kprobes
References: <44BDAFB888F59F408FAE3CC35AB47041019F7B82@orsmsx409>

Keshavamurthy, Anil S wrote:

Two jprobes cannot be registered at the same address however.

Are there any plans to remove above restrictions in future?

I am not sure why we need to register two jprobes at the entry of a function. Do you have some practical case where this feature would be useful?

Tested and works on x86, I will be testing it on ppc64. Appreciate if
someone can give it a spin on x86_64.
I can take this up but can't test until Monday.

I plan to post it to lkml early next week if all goes well.

Nice work.
thanks,
Anil

References:
- RE: [PATCH] Allow a jprobe to coexist with kprobes
  - From: Keshavamurthy, Anil S

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]