This is the mail archive of the sid@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the SID project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: cvs sid looks for wrong tcl

To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche at redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: cvs sid looks for wrong tcl
From: Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 15:06:05 -0700
CC: sid at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <200110022020.f92KKtZ21625@eureka.bothner.com> <20011002171600.J19180@redhat.com>

Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:

>Thanks; I don't know whether we'll apply this or just wait for a
>resynch opportunity.  In the mean time, I recommend you
>"cvs release -d sid" from your working tree.
>
Are you serious?  If that is your feeling about the public source tree,
then why do you have one?  More to the point, why is sid part of
the integrated source tree?  If you express the general feeling among
sid developers, then I would recommend that that sid be removed from
the integrated source tree.

    --Per

Follow-Ups:
- Re: cvs sid looks for wrong tcl
  - From: Frank Ch. Eigler

References:
- cvs sid looks for wrong tcl
  - From: Per Bothner
- Re: cvs sid looks for wrong tcl
  - From: Frank Ch. Eigler

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]