This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 6/29/2017 2:38 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2017-06-29 07:04, Corinna Vinschen wrote:On Jun 29 13:53, Corinna Vinschen wrote:On Jun 29 12:41, Aditya Upadhyay wrote:Hello Developers, This is the modified patch for csinl.c which reflects changes in Makefile.am.Uhm... this patch now contains *only* the Makefile.am change, but not the expected csinl.c file. v3? ;)Never mind, I'm going to apply v1 and v2 of patch 18. However, usually a v2 (or v3, v4, ...) of a patch is expected to replace the v1 of the patch entirely, not that it just contains a diff to v1. I pushed the set now and regenerated complex/Makefile.in.This patchset is causing errors when building Cygwin: newlib/libm/complex/cargl.c: In function cargl’: newlib/libm/complex/cargl.c:16:25: error: implicit declaration of function ‘imag’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] return atan2l (imag (z), real (z)); ^ newlib/libm/complex/cargl.c:16:35: error: implicit declaration of function ‘real’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] return atan2l (imag (z), real (z)); ^
It builds for RTEMS (sparc) with some new warnings: newlib/libm/complex/cacoshl.c:42:16: warning: implicit declaration of function 'csqrtl'; did you mean 'csqrtf'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] newlib/libm/complex/cacoshl.c:42:6: warning: implicit declaration of function 'clogl'; did you mean 'clogf'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] newlib/libm/complex/cacosl.c:41:6: warning: implicit declaration of function 'casinl'; did you mean 'asinl'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] newlib/libm/complex/casinhl.c:39:18: warning: implicit declaration of function 'casinl'; did you mean 'casinhl'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] newlib/libm/complex/casinl.c:112:7: warning: implicit declaration of function 'csqrtl'; did you mean 'sqrtl'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] newlib/libm/complex/casinl.c:115:7: warning: implicit declaration of function 'clogl'; did you mean 'logl'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] newlib/libm/complex/catanhl.c:39:18: warning: implicit declaration of function 'catanl'; did you mean 'catanhl'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] newlib/libm/complex/cpowl.c:47:9: warning: implicit declaration of function 'cargl'; did you mean 'cargf'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] I don't see any Cygwin ifdef's related to imag() so I built for i386-rtems to see if it was related to _LDBL_EQ_DBL. i386-rtems built with a few warnings. We have an x86_64-rtems tool target in anticipation of a port. I built a tool chain just to check this and the newlib master built cleanly on that. I am sorry but I am not duplicating this. What would be different about Cygwin in this case? --joel
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |