So ,To not rely on stdbool.h from c99, do i have to port stdbool.h here also ?
Otherwise we can use
#ifndef __cplusplus
typedef enum { false, true } bool;
#endif
Thanks a lot for your suggested modification. I am applying the
required the modification.
Regards,
Aditya Upadhyay
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> wrote:
On Jun 21 08:46, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 21/06/17 04:24, aditya upadhyay wrote:
Hello Developers,
In cacoshl.c, There is a dependency between cacoshl.c and csqrtl.c.
In ported csqrtl.c from NetBSD, stdbool.h is there, But i saw there
is no stdbool.h.
So for bool data type, I have used enum. Is it a right way or not.
please suggest or do i have to use stdbool.h from gcc library ?
<stdbool.h> is currently not used by Newlib. I am not sure if we should add
this dependency if its only needed by csqrtl.c (in overall NetBSD libm) and
not visible to the user.
I would replace the #include <stdbool.h> with
#ifndef __cplusplus
typedef enum { false, true } bool;
#endif
and keep the rest of the code unchanged.
Wait. Isn't stdbool.h available in gcc for ages? When building newlib,
shouldn't we be able to rely on c99 being available?
Corinna