This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] Use latest <semaphore.h> from FreeBSD for RTEMS




On 11/03/15 13:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 11 13:35, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Mar 11 13:17, Sebastian Huber wrote:
+#define	SEM_VALUE_MAX	(__INT_MAX__ * 2U + 1U)
Should the definition of SEM_VALUE_MAX be __BSD_VISIBLE?  It's not a
definition required or even mentioned in POSIX.
We have a {SEM_VALUE_MAX} here:

http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/sem_open.html

Is this not a define?  In FreeBSD it is not covered by __BSD_VISIBLE.
This is weird.  SEM_VALUE_MAX is not mentioned in
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/semaphore.h.html

Is that a bug in the specification?
SUSv4 defines SEM_VALUE_MAX to be in limits.h.  That's where we
have it in Cygwin, too.  There's also the definition of SEM_VALUE_MAX
for RTEMS in libc/sys/rtems/include/limits.h.

It seems defining it additionally in semaphore.h is not quite correct.
It also contradicts the value from your limits.h (32767).


Corinna


Thanks, for the thorough review. I will update the patch. This SEM_VALUE_MAX seems to be quite ill defined. In Newlib the libc/sys/linux/linuxthreads/semaphore.h defines it too in contrast to glibc which defines in in limits.h. Probably nobody cares about this value.

--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH

Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone   : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax     : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail  : sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de
PGP     : Public key available on request.

Diese Nachricht ist keine geschÃftliche Mitteilung im Sinne des EHUG.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]