This is the mail archive of the
newlib@sourceware.org
mailing list for the newlib project.
Re: [PATCH libgloss]Using spec files to support two version of newlib library in one tool-chain release
- From: "Bin.Cheng" <amker dot cheng at gmail dot com>
- To: "newlib at sourceware dot org" <newlib at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 11:39:43 +0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH libgloss]Using spec files to support two version of newlib library in one tool-chain release
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <001e01cfb600$ce404f10$6ac0ed30$ at arm dot com> <53EA3269 dot 1080304 at LGSInnovations dot com> <1407866624 dot 2601 dot 77 dot camel at ubuntu-sellcey> <000001cfb6b9$b6fa3690$24eea3b0$ at arm dot com> <20140813115827 dot GH21106 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <165930362 dot 28789080 dot 1407948487418 dot JavaMail dot zimbra at redhat dot com> <000a01cfb78d$cfdd1cc0$6f975640$ at arm dot com> <20140814080008 dot GA17310 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <001f01cfb79a$93680c70$ba382550$ at arm dot com> <002901cfb79a$e412d600$ac388200$ at arm dot com> <20140814150059 dot GQ21106 at calimero dot vinschen dot de>
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 11:00 PM, Corinna Vinschen <vinschen@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Aug 14 16:36, Bin Cheng wrote:
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: newlib-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:newlib-
>> > owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Bin Cheng
>> > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 4:35 PM
>> > To: newlib@sourceware.org
>> > Subject: RE: [PATCH libgloss]Using spec files to support two version of newlib
>> > library in one tool-chain release
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: newlib-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:newlib-
>> > > owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
>> > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 4:00 PM
>> > > To: newlib@sourceware.org
>> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH libgloss]Using spec files to support two version
>> > > of newlib library in one tool-chain release
>> > >
>> > > Hi Bin,
>> > >
>> > > On Aug 14 15:03, Bin Cheng wrote:
>> > > > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > > > From: newlib-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:newlib-
>> > > > > owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Johnston
>> > > > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 12:48 AM
>> > > > > To: newlib@sourceware.org
>> > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH libgloss]Using spec files to support two
>> > > > > version of newlib I think _nano is better since the specs file is
>> > > > > called called nano.specs and it is a new invention no one will be
>> > > > > familiar with yet. The nano version of the library has some
>> > > > > caveats that the end-user needs to understand so make it easier
>> > > > > for them to find the
>> > > documentation and understand what it is.
>> > > > >
>> > > > Thanks for the comments.
>> > > > Here comes the patch using lib*_nana.a, please review.
>> > >
>> > > You accidentally missed to attach the patch.
>> > >
>> > Sorry about that. The patch can be simply replaced by sed.
>> I mean the change is trivial. But I DID forgot to include it.
>
> Patch applied.
Hi Corinna,
Thanks for applying, only elf-nano.specs is missing. I suppose the
old cvs causes this?
Thanks,
bin
>
>
> Thanks,
> Corinna
>
> --
> Corinna Vinschen
> Cygwin Maintainer
> Red Hat