RE: [PATCH libgloss]Using spec files to support two version of newlib library in one tool-chain release

["Bin Cheng" <bin dot cheng at arm dot com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: newlib-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:newlib-
> owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 4:00 PM
> To: newlib@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH libgloss]Using spec files to support two version of newlib
> library in one tool-chain release
> 
> Hi Bin,
> 
> On Aug 14 15:03, Bin Cheng wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: newlib-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:newlib-
> > > owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Johnston
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 12:48 AM
> > > To: newlib@sourceware.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH libgloss]Using spec files to support two version
> > > of newlib I think _nano is better since the specs file is called
> > > called nano.specs and it is a new invention no one will be familiar
> > > with yet.  The nano version of the library has some caveats that the
> > > end-user needs to understand so make it easier for them to find the
> documentation and understand what it is.
> > >
> > Thanks for the comments.
> > Here comes the patch using lib*_nana.a, please review.
> 
> You accidentally missed to attach the patch.
> 
Sorry about that.  The patch can be simply replaced by sed.

Thanks,
bin
> 
> Corinna
> 
> --
> Corinna Vinschen
> Cygwin Maintainer
> Red Hat

Attachment: nano-spec-20140814.txt
Description: Text document