This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thursday 18 July 2013 12:01:20 Joel Sherrill wrote: > I am trying to write the rules to give to a future volunteer which > may or may not be me. > > Is it possible to get group consensus on the conditionals which reflect > each of the columns in the API tables for SUS V4? i think POSIX dictates the defines and their values already. like here: http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/V2_chap02.html#tag_15_02_01_01 > http://www.unix.org/version4/GS5_APIs.pdf > > I am having trouble seeing how each API standard doesn't correspond > to a single conditional or maybe a POSIX standard range. And if it > was required by K&R or C89 or XXX, then it is unconditional. iiuc, when POSIX adds things, there's no guarantees that it adds everything at once from a specific external spec, or at the same time. or when things get removed. so different spec versions can yield a different feature set. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |