This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 11/22/2012 11:27 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:Note: I did not say your patch is wrong. I only said it needs more testing (== time).On 11/22/2012 10:37 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote:
introduces __STDINT_EXP() in inttypes.h. If we use the GCC provided stdint.h, then this results in:
inttypes.h:245:32: error: missing binary operator before token "(" inttypes.h:248:34: error: missing binary operator before token "("
reproducer?
I tried to use the current Newlib HEAD.
RTEMS has been using the GCC provided stdint.h combined with a different patch
to newlib's inttypes.h applied[1] with none such error having been reported by
anybody anywhere.
That said, as this patch has not seen wider exposure to the public, this patch
is too intruse to allow it letting it into newlib without further _extensive_
testing in and outside of RTEMS.
Correct. Most critical issue is newlib's stdint.h is conflicting with the GCC generated one during bootstrapping the GCC/newlib.Ralf
[1] These patches were not submitted because they are hacks and because there
are other issues inside of newlib when being used with GCC's stdint.h.
Ok, this means that current Newlib + GCC provided stdint.h is broken at the moment?
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |