This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ pure virtual base class memory consumption

From: fueb <fueb at gmx dot net>
To: newlib at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:57:12 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: C++ pure virtual base class memory consumption
References: <34325972.post@talk.nabble.com> <50333AF5.8090902@embedded-brains.de> <34330808.post@talk.nabble.com> <201208221442.01541.ppisa4lists@pikron.com>

I diffed the two mapfiles and the few lines I added above are an excerpt from
the larger binary. I now 
understand that this is code s not from newlib (since newlib is pure C,
right?) but GCC and the libstdc++. 

I also tried the mentioned flags -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions but with no
effort. 

Well, the prebuilt c++ library is provided by a third party and I did not
build it on my own. So I will try to 
rebuild libstdc++ with exceptions and rtti disabled. Can you give me a hint
on which mailinglist to change if 
there were any questions?
-- 
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/C%2B%2B-pure-virtual-base-class-memory-consumption-tp34325972p34336357.html
Sent from the Sourceware - newlib list mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

References:
- C++ pure virtual base class memory consumption
  - From: fueb
- Re: C++ pure virtual base class memory consumption
  - From: Sebastian Huber
- Re: C++ pure virtual base class memory consumption
  - From: fueb
- Re: C++ pure virtual base class memory consumption
  - From: Pavel Pisa

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]