This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] ARM V7E-M support for newlib and lib1funcs.asm

From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
To: Daniel Gutson <dgutson at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: newlib at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:20:49 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM V7E-M support for newlib and lib1funcs.asm
References: <4B7072AD.8030301@codesourcery.com>

On 08/02/10 20:23, Daniel Gutson wrote:

The attached patches add support for the ARM V7E-M architecture,
considering the __ARM_ARCH_7EM__ macro that gcc already defines when the
architecture option is specified.

I'm sending these patches in a single mail since they are closely
related (my apologies if it shouldn't be this way).

In the case of newlib, please commit it for me if accepted since I don't
have write access.

In the case of gcc, please let me know if OK to commit.

Thanks,
Daniel.

newlib ChangeLog:
2010-02-08 Daniel Gutson <dgutson@codesourcery.com>

newlib/
* libc/machine/arm/arm_asm.h (_ISA_THUMB_2): __ARM_ARCH_7EM__
added to the preprocessor condition.

gcc ChangeLog:
2010-02-08 Daniel Gutson <dgutson@codesourcery.com>
gcc/
* config/arm/lib1funcs.asm (__ARM_ARCH__): __ARM_ARCH_7EM__
added to the preprocessor condition.

The GCC part is OK.

Note, it's not wrong, but I think it's not a good idea to cross-post patches to multiple projects (my mail server is configured to do duplicate removal so this message only appeared in my newlib folder and I nearly missed the GCC component).

R.

References:
- [PATCH] ARM V7E-M support for newlib and lib1funcs.asm
  - From: Daniel Gutson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]