This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Use longlong.h?

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Joern Rennecke <amylaar at spamcop dot net>, Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>, newlib at sourceware dot org, gcc at gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:39:00 -0800
Subject: Re: Use longlong.h?
References: <20081217193540.5gm514vmcgkgkk0w-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <4963E926.1030207@redhat.com> <20090107071502.ty3pfzpk2socc80o-nzlynne@webmail.spamcop.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901071524130.2547@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

Joseph S. Myers wrote:

> As code shared by GCC and glibc I would suggest the same license notice as 
> soft-fp (LGPL >= 2.1 + exception) to allow an identical file to be shared.  
> (Indeed, soft-fp uses this header.)  The version in GMP diverged long ago 
> so sharing the file with that may not be feasible.

I have suggested this change to the SC.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Use longlong.h?
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- Re: Use longlong.h?
  - From: Jeff Johnston
- Re: Use longlong.h?
  - From: Joern Rennecke
- Re: Use longlong.h?
  - From: Joseph S. Myers

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]