[PATCH] New functions wprintf, fwprintf, swprintf, vwprintf, vfwprintf, vswprintf
Corinna Vinschen
vinschen@redhat.com
Thu Mar 5 21:55:00 GMT 2009
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] New functions wprintf, fwprintf, swprintf, vwprintf, vfwprintf, vswprintf
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] New functions wprintf, fwprintf, swprintf, vwprintf, vfwprintf, vswprintf
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Mar 5 14:40, Howland Craig D (Craig) wrote:
> Since the wide-character functions were introduced for C99, which also
> introduced and requires the long long (and long double) types, does it
> make sense to propagate the printf _WANT_IO_LONG_LONG configuration
> option to the wide functions?
IMHO, yes. There might still a legitimate interest to keep this in for
a couple of smaller targets.
> Should the Newlib printf flag extensions (DOUq) be kept for wprintf?
Probably not. I thought to remove them as well at one point, but
wanted to discuss this on the list first. I just forgot to mention this
in my patch submission. Thanks for following up with this question.
I thin we should remove them, yes. I'm interested in Jeff's opinion,
though.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Project Co-Leader
Red Hat
- Previous message (by thread): [PATCH] New functions wprintf, fwprintf, swprintf, vwprintf, vfwprintf, vswprintf
- Next message (by thread): [PATCH] New functions wprintf, fwprintf, swprintf, vwprintf, vfwprintf, vswprintf
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Newlib
mailing list