This is the mail archive of the newlib@sourceware.org mailing list for the newlib project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] link headers if possible

From: Andrew STUBBS <andrew dot stubbs at st dot com>
To: "Neal H. Walfield" <neal at walfield dot org>
Cc: newlib at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:59:47 +0000
Subject: Re: [patch] link headers if possible
References: <87ejcag3e2.wl%neal@walfield.org> <4795CBF0.7050208@st.com> <87d4ruf7e4.wl%neal@walfield.org>

Neal H. Walfield wrote:

This apporach would be fine but unless I misunderstand your code, your
code does not use the same selection criteria for choosing the headers
to install.  For instance, there is a lock.h in
libc/include/sys/lock.h and another in libc/sys/linux/sys/lock.h.
When configuring for GNU/Linux, the latter is installed in
targ-include, other the more generic one is used.

Quite so, it's merely some code I pulled out of one of my makefiles and modified a few variable names. I don't claim it doesn't need adjusting.

Andrew

References:
- [patch] link headers if possible
  - From: Neal H. Walfield
- Re: [patch] link headers if possible
  - From: Andrew STUBBS
- Re: [patch] link headers if possible
  - From: Neal H. Walfield

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]