Re: Patch to update libtool in GCC and Src trees

[Jeff Johnston <jjohnstn at redhat dot com>]

Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > libtool@cwilson.fastmail.fm wrote:
> >     
> > > On Mon, 21 May 2007 09:40:56 +0200, "Paolo Bonzini" said:
> > >       
> > > > Ok as soon as the gcc PR32009 is solved, which should be one day or two. 
> > > >   This will also give some time to complain to the gdb/binutils/newlib 
> > > > people.
> > > >         
> > > Given
> > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009#c9 
> > >       
> > Yes, go on.
> >
> > Paolo
> >     
>
> Just to make sure, Jeff are you OK with the newlib part of this patch?
> I think you said you were but I don't want to change the configure.in
> and Makefile.am files in newlib without being positive you are on board
> with the change too.  These changes are the ones created by Charles
> Wilson.
>
> Steve Ellcey
> sje@cup.hp.com
>   
I don't remember seeing the actual patch.  This is the one proposed that 
does not use libtool unless we ask for it so it was definitely my 
preference.  IIRC, the proposal was to change the way we set up libtool 
and it added a few macros prior to the check for libtool-used.  If that 
is correct, there should be no problem.

-- Jeff J.