powf() manual error

Jeff Johnston jjohnstn@redhat.com
Wed Feb 28 15:36:00 GMT 2007


Comment in w_pow.c used to generated docs has been fixed.

-- Jeff J.

Ryan Underwood wrote:
> In my copy of newlib (dated August 2006), the manpage for pow() and
> powf() erroneously gives two prototypes for pow(), instead of one for
> pow() and one for powf().
> 



More information about the Newlib mailing list