This is the mail archive of the
newlib@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the newlib project.
Re: 1.3.2: signgam problem still present in plotutils, gnuplot etc.
- To: "J. Johnston" <jjohnstn at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: 1.3.2: signgam problem still present in plotutils, gnuplot etc.
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 18:24:49 -0400
- Cc: newlib at sources dot redhat dot com, cygwin at cygwin dot com, wuebbel at math dot uni-muenster dot de
- References: <000201c0f363$01992720$0100a8c0@duron> <20010612143708.A413@redhat.com> <002301c0f376$e165a780$0100a8c0@duron> <20010612195312.B2062@redhat.com> <3B27D692.AFA9BE8E@cygnus.com>
- Reply-To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 05:09:38PM -0400, J. Johnston wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:35:38PM +0200, Frank Wuebbeling wrote:
>>>>Hmm. I don't recall anyone submitting a patch for this.
>>>
>>>The mailing on the CYGWIN list I referred to had a patch, to which
>>>several people agreed it worked. It almost also did the job for
>>>plotutils, meaning it revealed a problem in plotutils, removing that
>>>one made it work (the problem was that plotutils assumes that signgam
>>>is a variable, and redeclares it - which fails if it is not and is
>>>obsolete anyway since math.h is responsible for declaring it).
>>>
>>>Again, the page was
>>>http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2001-03/msg01837.html. I quote the
>>>main idea. I have no idea whatsoever what the change really does, so I
>>>don't want to submit a patch - I just propose reconsidering the old
>>>posting which had one. I incorporated the fix in math.h. Here's the
>>>original posting:
>>
>>Ok. That's not a patch. I have no idea where this definition would
>>go. I'm sure that I could probably track it down but, if it is
>>important to you, you should start a thread on the newlib mailing list,
>>asking for the change since this is apparently a newlib construction.
>>
>>I've cc'ed newlib and redirected the discussion there.
>
>Newlib changed math.h in January to have an errno-like solution for
>signgam whereby a function gets called. Is math.h up to date in the
>user's Cygwin and is it being included by the source code in question?
>See: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/newlib-cvs/2001-q1/msg00013.html for
>details on the patch applied in January.
We're certainly using the most recent versions of newlib in the cygwin
releases. I can't speak to the user's specific problem, however.
cgf