Re: src/newlib/libm/math e_cosh.c e_sinh.c s_infco ...

["J. Johnston" <jjohnstn at cygnus dot com>]

jjohnstn@sourceware.cygnus.com wrote:
> 
> CVSROOT:        /cvs/src
> Module name:    src
> Changes by:     jjohnstn@sourceware.cygnus.com  2000-08-28 10:45:56
> 
> Modified files:
>         newlib/libm/math: e_cosh.c e_sinh.c s_infconst.c
> 
> Log message:
>         2000-08-23  Werner Almesberger  <Werner.Almesberger@epfl.ch>
> 
>         * libc/stdlib/mprec.c (ulp, b2d, d2b): changed a few expressions
>         like  x << y-z  to the equivalent  x << (y-z).
>         (d2b): changed if statements with assignment to perform the
>         assignment prior to the if check.
>         * libc/reent/reent.c: included stdlib.h for "_free_r" prototype.
>         * libc/unix/getpass.c (getpass): moved "echo" assignment out of if.
>         * libc/unix/ttyname.c: included string.h for "strcpy" prototype.
>         * libc/unix/getcwd.c (ISDOT): added parentheses to clarify && and ||
>         precedence.
>         * libc/include/sys/unistd.h: added "vfork" prototype (for popen.c).
>         Added "_execve" prototype (for execl.c, execle.c, execv.c, and
>         execve.c).
>         * libc/posix/popen.c (popen): added parentheses to clarify && and ||
>         precedence.
>         * libm/math/e_cosh.c (__ieee754_cosh): changed parentheses to
>         clarify && and || precendence (and to remove pascalism).
>         * libm/math/e_sinh.c (__ieee754_sinh): Ditto.
>         * libm/math/s_infconst.c: added another pair of braces to all
>         initializers for __infinity (need three: for __infinity[1] array,
>         for union __dmath, and for i[2]).
> 
> Patches:
> http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/newlib/libm/math/e_cosh.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1.1.1&r2=1.2
> http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/newlib/libm/math/e_sinh.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.1.1.1&r2=1.2
> http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/newlib/libm/math/s_infconst.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.2&r2=1.3

If you subscribe to the newlib patch mailing list and were wondering why you saw
this patch twice, it was because I inadvertently did not check in the three libm changes the other
day.  The original ChangeLog entry was used to specify the changes made.

-- Jeff Johnston (Red Hat Inc.)