This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: The hppa port is now moved out of ports.
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, "libc-ports at sourceware dot org" <libc-ports at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:58:04 -0400
- Subject: Re: The hppa port is now moved out of ports.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <535F60AC dot 4050702 at redhat dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1404291514330 dot 6770 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <536019AC dot 1000602 at redhat dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1404292145160 dot 14769 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
On 04/29/2014 05:46 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>
>> * Use libc-ports to highlight cross-port issues so maintainers
>> need not pay close attention to libc-alpha.
>
> I thought the conclusion was not to do that (that I was the only person
> suggesting repurposing libc-ports like that), but developers not updating
> all ports have the responsibility to draw attention to that fact and
> update <https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/PortStatus> when checking in the
> patch that only updates some ports.
So what did we decide we were going to do with libc-ports?
Once I answer that question I can go back and update the website
with the correct information.
Cheers,
Carlos.