This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: [PATCH] ARM: NEON detected memcpy.
- From: "Shih-Yuan Lee (FourDollars)" <sylee at canonical dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: patches at eglibc dot org, libc-ports at sourceware dot org, rex dot tsai at canonical dot com, Jesse Sung <jesse dot sung at canonical dot com>, YC Cheng <yc dot cheng at canonical dot com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 11:56:09 +0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: NEON detected memcpy.
- References: <CAAT15mNnqeb6tuVdV6b4uJf-qFDH1acxevyW6f-gH+SkguENmg at mail dot gmail dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1304031505020 dot 580 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <CAAT15mMJSHiO5rZ6EAbss79f_t4Qiaryi-qjmw3TwGg4vrg2=A at mail dot gmail dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1304031557150 dot 580 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk>
Hi Joseph,
Thank you for your guidance.
I will try to contact Siarhei Siamashka and Nokia to see how we can
make things happening.
Regards,
$4
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Joseph S. Myers
<joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2013, Shih-Yuan Lee (FourDollars) wrote:
>
>> Hi Joseph,
>>
>> I know there is some legal homework but I don't know how to do it.
>> Could you provide more details about how to put such copyright
>> assignment (with some real example is better)?
>
> See
> <http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/Copyright-Papers.html>. To
> use anything based on the 2009 work, either Nokia will need to complete a
> corporate copyright assignment for that work, if it is copyright Nokia
> pursuant to whatever employment contract Siarhei Siamashka had with Nokia
> at the time, or Nokia will need to complete an employer disclaimer and
> Siarhei Siamashka will need to complete an individual assignment. And the
> same applies for anyone else who has made significant contributions to the
> code.
>
>> About raised power consumption and context switch costs, I may be able
>> to add some option in configure for the users to decide if they want
>> to use this feature or not.
>> How do you think?
>
> I suggest raising such a question of configure options for such trade-offs
> more generally on libc-alpha.
>
> --
> Joseph S. Myers
> joseph@codesourcery.com