This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Memory fencing problem in pthread cancellation

From: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
Cc: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>, Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, <libc-ports at sourceware dot org>, Marcus Shawcroft <marcus dot shawcroft at linaro dot org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 23:50:33 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Memory fencing problem in pthread cancellation
References: <50F46969.1000305@redhat.com> <50F48281.3070207@systemhalted.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1301142218260.19709@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <50F48DA4.4000407@systemhalted.org>

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Carlos O'Donell wrote:

> It looks like the assembly in unwind-resume.c and unwind-forcedunwind.c
> are identical and should be shared?

They call different functions (init versus pthread_cancel_init).

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Memory fencing problem in pthread cancellation
  - From: Carlos O'Donell
- Re: [PATCH] Memory fencing problem in pthread cancellation
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [PATCH] Memory fencing problem in pthread cancellation
  - From: Carlos O'Donell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]