This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tuesday 18 September 2012 14:57:17 Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On 9/18/2012 1:06 PM, Roland McGrath wrote: > > That looks fine to me, though I am having second thoughts about the exact > > choice of name. SYMBOL_SIZE doesn't really communicate that it computes > > based on ., i.e. that the placement of the macro relative to assembly > > code following the symbol is crucial. Good names are not coming to mind > > just now. > > Imply that it's computed: SYMBOL_CALC_SIZE? > > Imply that it's positional: SYMBOL_HERE_SIZE? if we aren't terribly set on names, i'd say let's just use the same macros that the kernel already does since other projects have picked up those styles. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |