This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI

From: Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
To: libc-ports at sourceware dot org
Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 09:14:58 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI
References: <CANLjY-kZ6FakmtKkHjjC2YNgCBkydiNq8F81Fb7SgW0RE6iF5w@mail.gmail.com> <201205231001.17818.aj@suse.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1205231017070.5860@jbgna.fhfr.qr> <201205231016.29997.vapier@gentoo.org> <CANLjY-=unqAnKAa6jpyvYo1N8-xEQJM0DMXKi8i2NUfxjMG-vw@mail.gmail.com>

On 05/23/2012 10:11 PM, Michael Hope wrote:
> My concern is that a point release of GCC would stop working against
> the latest release of GLIBC.

Can't we put the compatibility symlink into the official glibc
codebase?

Andrew.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI
  - From: Mike Frysinger

References:
- Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI
  - From: Mike Frysinger
- Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Use different linker path for hardfloat ABI
  - From: Michael Hope

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]