This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: [ARM] getcontext routines v2
- From: Michael Hope <michael dot hope at linaro dot org>
- To: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
- Cc: libc-ports at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:17:04 +1300
- Subject: Re: [ARM] getcontext routines v2
- Authentication-results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of michael.hope@linaro.org designates 10.180.95.1 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=michael.hope@linaro.org
- References: <4F46E90C.3010305@linaro.org> <CADZpyixoCmz=uUkGix1=PNH4LJJMwCobiBRtRUovp5PqHTLWZg@mail.gmail.com> <4F4BFDA6.1070602@linaro.org> <CADZpyiz7F4sqCj8LVk_=C6r1HJH+TEOf+--XiRFBO6z0OS-M_A@mail.gmail.com> <4F4C1000.5080308@linaro.org>
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Michael Hope <michael.hope@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 28/02/12 12:05, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Michael Hope<michael.hope@linaro.org>
>> ?wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I looked over things briefly and the formatting and license looks OK.
>>>> Do you and Dave have FSF copyright assignments in place?
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes. ?Linaro has an assignment agreement for GCC, GDB, binutils, and
>>> GLIBC
>>> under case #664398.
>>
>>
>> Excellent. Thanks.
>>
>>>> (1) Is setcontext correctly implemented?
>>>
>>> It's correct to the specification and matches the MIPS and Tile ports.
>>> ?From
>>> IEEE 1003.1:2004:
>>
>>
>> I've gone and re-read the standard, and I agree with you.
>>
>> Personally I think there is a QoI issue here, but you meet the
>> standard which is the right thing to do.
>
>
> Agreed. ?Being able to change uc_link while in a makecontext() child would
> be nice.
Ping?
-- Michael