This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] HPPA : Define all the hppa specific _CLOEXEC and _NONBLOCK values


On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 11:20:32 -0400
Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Carlos O'Donell
> <carlos@systemhalted.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Guy Martin <gmsoft@tuxicoman.be>
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 10:34:12 -0400
> >> "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@systemhalted.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Is this because hppa doesn't use the same values as x86 and the
> >>> only way to get your own values is to modify your own copies of
> >>> said files?
> >>
> >> As far as I can see, yes. Alpha is doing exactly the same thing.
> >>
> >> Maybe a better fix would be to have glibc derive the value of all
> >> the _CLOEXEC and _NONBLOCK from O_CLOEXEC and O_NONBLOCK instead
> >> of each having its own copy. This is how they are defined in the
> >> kernel anyway.
> >
> > Yes, it would be a better fix. However, I understand that this would
> > be more work and you may not have much time as a volunteer. Are you
> > interested in fixing this problem in a more general way? I would be
> > willing to help champion such a patch on libc-alpha.
> >
> > It's getting a bit out of hand that each machine has to carry
> > complete copies of all of these headers.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Carlos.
> 
> I think we'd be interested in doing something like this for alpha as
> well.
> 
> Matt


It seems that sparc is doing the same as well.
I'll produce a patch for glibc and glibc-ports that cleans this up.

Cheers,
  Guy


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]