This is the mail archive of the
libc-ports@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the libc-ports project.
Re: [PATCH] kernel-features.h for hppa
- From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
- To: libc-ports at sourceware dot org
- Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>, parisc-linux <parisc-linux at lists dot parisc-linux dot org>
- Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 19:07:14 -0400
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel-features.h for hppa
- Geoman: IS A RETARD
- Organization: wh0rd.org
- References: <119aab440604141529p4a9bf2a9r33e6ebbb1138acc9@mail.gmail.com>
On Friday 14 April 2006 18:29, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> +# define __ASSUME_32BITUIDS????????????1
> +# define __ASSUME_TRUNCATE64_SYSCALL???1
> +# define __ASSUME_MMAP2_SYSCALL????????????????1
> +# define __ASSUME_STAT64_SYSCALL???????1
> +# define __ASSUME_IPC64????????????????????????1
> +# define __ASSUME_ST_INO_64_BIT????????????????1
> +# define __ASSUME_FCNTL64??????????????1
> +# define __ASSUME_GETDENTS64_SYSCALL???1
some excess whitespace leftover between the '#' and the 'define' due to the
copy & paste from the old file ?
> +#include_next <kernel-features.h>
i always wondered which one of these is preferable:
#include_next <kernel-features.h>
or
#include <sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/kernel-features.h>
-mike