This is the mail archive of the libc-ports@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the libc-ports project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Question on "never use the ports/ name in code or in log entries"

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Roland McGrath <roland at redhat dot com>
Cc: Lior Balkohen <balkohen at gmail dot com>, libc-ports at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 12:39:50 -0500
Subject: Re: Question on "never use the ports/ name in code or in log entries"
References: <196b7d310602230616l43d02662v@mail.gmail.com> <20060223215847.A4F2D180AB1@magilla.sf.frob.com>

On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 01:58:47PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Mentioned from Roland, we may not use the ports/ name in code or in
> > log entries.  But a simple grep -R -e '<ports/' in ports results that
> > people have already used ports/ name in code.
> 
> This should be fixed.  The add-on may not be called that at all.  There
> should be adequate -Is to find everything.  I am about to change around how
> add-ons work, so I'll be sure to fix this so it works.

Any news on this, Roland?  Otherwise I'll have to work around it some
other way for now.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question on "never use the ports/ name in code or in log entries"
  - From: Roland McGrath

References:
- Question on "never use the ports/ name in code or in log entries"
  - From: Lior Balkohen
- Re: Question on "never use the ports/ name in code or in log entries"
  - From: Roland McGrath

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]