This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
[Bug localedata/21806] Wrong LC_NAME in Arabic Locals
- From: "maiku.fabian at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: libc-locales at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 08:20:37 +0000
- Subject: [Bug localedata/21806] Wrong LC_NAME in Arabic Locals
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-21806-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21806
Mike FABIAN <maiku.fabian at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #6 from Mike FABIAN <maiku.fabian at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Wei-Lun Chao from comment #4)
> After checking ar_* I found:
>
> ar_EG:
> name_fmt "<U0025><U0070><U0025><U0074><U0025><U0066><U0025><U0074>/
> <U0025><U0067>"
>
> ar_SA:
> name_fmt "<U0025><U0064><U0025><U0074><U0025><U0067><U0025><U0074>/
> <U0025><U006D><U0025><U0074><U0025><U0066>"
>
> Which one is correct, or both? Arabic as a macro-language may have the same
> problem like Chinese.
Yes, I think the same.
I don’t want to apply this change to all Arabic locales, there
could be differences between the Arabic locales, we would need
to have better references. I guess it is quite likely that these
strings should be different for different Arabic locales.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.