This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
[Bug localedata/21217] localedata: Update months from CLDR-31
- From: "gpopac at gmail dot com" <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- To: libc-locales at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 22:25:18 +0000
- Subject: [Bug localedata/21217] localedata: Update months from CLDR-31
- Auto-submitted: auto-generated
- References: <bug-21217-716@http.sourceware.org/bugzilla/>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21217
--- Comment #17 from Милош Поповић <gpopac at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Rafal Luzynski from comment #16)
> (In reply to Милош Поповић from comment #15)
> > [...]
> > "sr@latin" is automagically generated from "sr" (thus the changes will be
> > overwritten).
>
> Are you sure this is also true in glibc project? I haven't found such
> mechanism here.
Not sure, and most likely not true if the Latin and Cyrilic names differ.
> The question is whether the change from "juni" to "jun" and "juli" to "jul"
> in Serbian Latin is correct and, while at this, whether the current Serbian
> Cyrillic months "јун" and "јул" are correct and require no change. This all
> applies to the full month names in the nominative case.
OK. So the Cyrilic names are fine, while the latin names should be changes to
"jun" and "jul" as you proposed. Sorry for making some confusion about this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.