This is the mail archive of the libc-locales@sourceware.org mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug localedata/10871] ru_RU: 'mon' array should contain both nominative and genitive cases


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10871

Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak at lingonborough dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Attachment #9595|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #70 from Rafal Luzynski <digitalfreak at lingonborough dot com> ---
Created attachment 9709
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9709&action=edit
Proposed solution: support alternative month names (version 5)

Here goes the new set of patches.

The main difference is what I realized after comparing how this problem has
been solved in other systems.  My idea that alt_mon should be optional was
wrong.  Making it obligatory simplifies the code, we don't have to check if a
particular alternative month name is NULL or empty.  Locale data are part of
glibc, we are able to provide the data fulfilling our own requirements.  For
the languages which do not need two forms of months names this means that
months names must be copied from mon to alt_mon even although both forms are
identical.

Difference between this patch and the one from comment 65: alt_mon locale data
section made obligatory.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]