This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
Re: CLDR locales support in glibc
- From: Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddress at gmail dot com>
- To: Rostislav Devyatov <deviatov at gmail dot com>
- Cc: libc-locales at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 09:15:10 -0400
- Subject: Re: CLDR locales support in glibc
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CA+UbMgu1JjUoh9N3vcRT-TPFyzB0rnnMmCgfKuLA0RDCpqHC_g at mail dot gmail dot com> <20160505003556 dot GQ26300 at vapier dot lan> <CAHdAatY2V_Hgo+YSG7Qjv6=sO4m+aKW9RpMWP0Ud0=8nKRCcLA at mail dot gmail dot com> <CA+UbMgvmoKyo1Hif7A2=ZFzNe_XPs+QZ0n386d7OvzwtSog7-A at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 9:02 AM, Rostislav Devyatov <deviatov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Would en_NL serve your purpose adequately?
>
> Yes, I think so.
>
> Also, I've just noticed a different thing, which I didn't know (or
> didn't pay attention to) when I asked my first question. This is not a
> problem for me, this is just a "remark for the general discussion of
> support for en_NL or CLDR's en_150".
>
I'm glad there is an immediate solution, but I also think the broader
discussion is important. I'm still mulling over a reply addressing
the bigger question.
cjl