This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
Re: [Bug localedata/14641] LC_NAME: deprecate locale category
- From: Keld Simonsen <keld at keldix dot com>
- To: vapier at gentoo dot org <sourceware-bugzilla at sourceware dot org>
- Cc: libc-locales at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 10:09:55 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Bug localedata/14641] LC_NAME: deprecate locale category
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <bug-14641-716 at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/> <bug-14641-716-Yb74GAN6YZ at http dot sourceware dot org/bugzilla/>
On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 04:50:29AM +0000, vapier at gentoo dot org wrote:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14641
>
> --- Comment #37 from Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org> ---
> (In reply to keld@keldix.com from comment #36)
>
> i was looking at POSIX:
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap07.html
>
> ISO 30112 does not appear to be public, and i'm not about to waste $200 on
> private standards. `man 5 locale` is about the only public reference i can
> find.
Well, the ISO C standard is not public either, and we do try to follow it.
There at copies of working drafts of ISO 14652 and ISO 30112 available:
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG20/docs/n972-14652ft.pdf
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC35/WG5/docs/30112d10.pdf
Both specs have explicit reference to glibc, and some specific cooperation with glibc.
> i don't see this limited bit of info being useful beyond toy programs, and even
> those are limited to specific locales. if people are serious about localizing,
> they're better off with a real library. having these fields in glibc misleads
> them into thinking they're more useful than they actually are. better to cut
> them off sooner and drive them to fuller solutions.
As I wrote, this information is what is commonly sought for eg. flights and hotels.
What do you have in mind of improvements?
Best regards
Keld