This is the mail archive of the
libc-locales@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.
Re: [PATCH][BZ 16973] Fix lang_lib/lang_term as per ISO 639-2
- From: Marko Myllynen <myllynen at redhat dot com>
- To: GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, libc-locales at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 16:46:53 +0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH][BZ 16973] Fix lang_lib/lang_term as per ISO 639-2
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <55C9AA31 dot 4010608 at redhat dot com> <20150814053157 dot GE17656 at vapier>
- Reply-to: myllynen at redhat dot com
Hi,
On 2015-08-14 08:31, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On 11 Aug 2015 10:54, Marko Myllynen wrote:
>> lang_lib (which reflects ISO 639-2/B (bibliographic) codes) and
>> lang_term (which reflects ISO 639-2/T (terminology) codes) should be
>> identical except for those languages for which ISO 639-2 specifies
>> separate bibliographic/terminology values.
>
> i'm inclined to just merge w/out having to load the standard and double
> check the values myself. is that wrong ?
FWIW, I used this Library of Congress page as the source, it seemed to
match the corresponding Wikipedia page:
http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/php/code_list.php
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ISO_639-2_codes
Thanks,
--
Marko Myllynen