This is the mail archive of the libc-locales@sourceware.org mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug localedata/14095] Review / update collation data from Unicode / ISO 14651


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14095

Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |carlos at redhat dot com

--- Comment #3 from Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com> ---
(In reply to joseph@codesourcery.com from comment #2)
> Yes, there is a lot of detailed, careful work involved in analysis of the 
> history of the current collation data in order to produce a justified 
> analysis of those questions with recommendations for how to use data from 
> current ISO 14651.  Given the responsibility to users to avoid 
> regressions, we need to understand what changes would be involved in such 
> an update, and satisfy ourselves that they are good changes rather than 
> regressions, as part of making such an update.  Contributors willing to 
> help with that careful analysis are welcome.

I agree completely with Joseph.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]