This is the mail archive of the libc-locales@sourceware.org mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[Bug localedata/16973] New: Fix lang_lib/lang_term as per ISO 639-2


https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16973

            Bug ID: 16973
           Summary: Fix lang_lib/lang_term as per ISO 639-2
           Product: glibc
           Version: unspecified
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: localedata
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: myllynen at redhat dot com
                CC: libc-locales at sourceware dot org

Created attachment 7610
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7610&action=edit
Fix lang_lib/lang_term as per ISO 639-2

lang_lib (which reflects ISO 639-2/B (bibliographic) codes) and lang_term
(which reflects ISO 639-2/T (terminology) codes) should be identical except for
those languages for which ISO 639-2 specifies separate
bibliographic/terminology values.

The attached patch got "silent approval" (i.e., negative responses) on
libc-locales, please see the thread for details:

https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-locales/2014-q2/msg00007.html

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]