This is the mail archive of the libc-locales@sourceware.org mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] en_CA, es_AR, es_ES: Define yesstr and nostr.


On 05/03/2013 09:43 AM, Keld Simonsen wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 07:49:19AM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>> On 04/07/2013 05:02 PM, Petr Baudis wrote:
>>>   Hi!
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 07, 2013 at 12:05:57PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>>>> My feeling is that this is positive progress on missing data.
>>>>
>>>> Comments?
>>>
>>>   I think it's fine, Acked-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@ucw.cz>.
>>>
>>>   Thank you for the verbose comments. :-)
>>
>> Checked in as is.
>>
>> We can handle the "uppercase" vs. "lowercase" first character
>> in yesstr/nostr as a distinct set of changes since they also
>> impact en_US.
>>
>> Right now I'm just trying to add yesstr and nostr to as many
>> locales as possible.
> 
> Why not then do the new ones with lowercase, that would reduce the
> work later on.

It's minor work compared to coming up with the policy and providing
rationale for the policy.

Have you added any guideline with rationale on the wiki so I can
use that to educate future contributors?

A good place to add it would be:
http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Locales

Once in place I can do a pass of all en_* to make them match.

Cheers,
Carlos.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]