This is the mail archive of the libc-locales@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GNU libc locales project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] small changes for fa_IR


[Hamed Malek]
> -category  "fa_IR:2002";LC_IDENTIFICATION
> +category  "fa_IR:2004";LC_IDENTIFICATION

Isn't the category field supposed to include a reference to the
standard used, and not the locale name and the year of the last
change?  I'm aware that almost all locales are incorrect in this
regard, but plan to change it.  I suspect this is the more correct
content:

  category  "i18n:<year of publication>";LC_IDENTIFICATION

or

  category  "posix:<year of publication>";LC_IDENTIFICATION

I have a patch for ld-identification.c to check the content, but
haven't submitted it yet as I do not really know the allowed list of
standard references.  Am I mistaken?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]