This is the mail archive of the
libc-help@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: ftstc implementation
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
- To: Suhas Chakravarty <suhas dot chakravarty at gmail dot com>
- Cc: "libc-help at sourceware dot org" <libc-help at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 17:48:23 +0200
- Subject: Re: ftstc implementation
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CABKwiS_RQpKE6Q_SM9QS-bH-6wDEP+nOMhiEaU7h6hS7dJfs1w at mail dot gmail dot com> <CABKwiS8fc=Mx92i0tiO0O-PS-ahmfwqL6gK-_NsRrEht+51s1Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAE2sS1gr4w9uXzOfeFUW1tphGMyeJKMdqaQB6-rtonn1Vrk3Dw at mail dot gmail dot com> <CABKwiS9X2g6FkLExx5sLqcDMK2d0fhBxJCADaje0ZXv=nzBvVQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAE2sS1jar9wB__T0OL5DJjO+MCd+EQGTy_8MgmrM_YBCG0F09g at mail dot gmail dot com> <CABKwiS-VB=ZLLWav13nmKYmO8DYetrjS_A3SO8wv8D5dz3o=aQ at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 6:03 AM, Suhas Chakravarty
<suhas.chakravarty@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am actually trying to create a semihosting enabled version of uboot
> so that I can bring it up on my custom ARM simulator, which doesn't
> have a UART in it right now. Therefore function definitions (printf,
> tstc etc) in console.c (one of the uboot sources), which rely on the
> target UART driver, need to be commented out and their definitions in
> newlib applied. It is in this context that I was searching for a
> newlib implementation of tstc/ftstc.
This makes sense. In which case I would suggesting reimplementing
implementing these two functions yourself to satisfy whatever
references you have that requires them or removing those references.
Cheers,
Carlos.