This is the mail archive of the libc-help@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [Ask for help]: Met a problem with strtof


Hello-

While I am not a true floating point expert, it would help to know:

What headers you are including (for example, are you using <stdlib.h>)?
What compile options are you using (for example, on the older gcc, are
you using -std=c99 )?



On 04/22/2014 08:19 AM, Wang Weidong wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I test the code below :
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> int main() {
> 
> 	char *str1="-0x1.4EF009P-16";
> 	char *str2="-0x1.744513P-55";
> 	char *str3="+0x1.1C7509P-19";
> 	float temp;
> 
> 	fesetround(FE_UPWARD);
> 
> 	temp = strtof(str1, NULL);
> 	printf(" %s -> %a\n", str1, temp);
> 
> 	fesetround(FE_DOWNWARD);
> 
>         temp = strtof(str2, NULL);
>         printf("%s -> %a\n", str2, temp);
>         temp = strtof(str3, NULL);
>         printf("%s -> %a\n", str3, temp);
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I met a problem as below:
> On SUSE-SP1 x86_64 with glibc-2.11-3 and gcc-4.3.2
> I got the result:
> 
> -0x1.4EF009P-16 -> -0x1.4ef00ap-16
> -0x1.744513P-55 -> -0x1.744514p-55
> +0x1.1C7509P-19 -> 0x1.1c750ap-19
> 
> while On Fedora x86_64 with glibc-2.17-19 and gcc-4.8.2
> I got the result:
> 
> -0x1.4EF009P-16 -> -0x1.4ef008p-16
> -0x1.744513P-55 -> -0x1.744512p-55
> +0x1.1C7509P-19 -> 0x1.1c7508p-19
> 
> All the fesetround setted success.
> Can someone tell me which is right and why?

-- 
Mark Brown
ms_brown@sbcglobal.net


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]